Which mobile OS is best for you? - Focus on the Android user interface

If you have not yet read our article on the iOS user interface we suggest you start there.

Customizable. The Google Android user interface is not all that different from the Apple's iOS interface. Instead of adopting a one size fits all approach, Google lets manufacturers and users modify the Android user interface to their hearts contents. You have the stock Android interface, and manufacturer customized interfaces. Whatever interface you start with, there are plenty of third party applications that will let you customize the basis interface. You can even use a live tile like Windows Phone 7 interface if you like. And this is the one of the core difference between Apple's iOS and Google's Android.

HTC's Sense user interface. A HTC customized
interface for the Android offered on it's mobile phones.

Before dwelling on the difference, let us look at the similarities. Like Apple's iOS, Google Android  has several home screens the you can flip through. The default Android interface has five home screens. HTC Sense has seven home screens. Samsung Touch UI can have up to nine home screens. You can move icons around he several home screens and place them in folders if you like. Google  has a dock, which holds three to four icons. The dock is customizable like iOS in some implementations of the Android O.S., like Samsung Touchwiz, and fixed in others, like HTC's Sense.

The weather animations which vary from clouds to
thunderstorms,  large retro clock with weather display maybe
gimmicky. But I like it. My home screen combine two widgets with four icons. 

Android adds some elements not present in the iOS user interface. In addition to the home screen, you have a Application Launcher, which displays all the applications installed in the device. At the top of the Android User interface is the notification bar which notifies you updates, tracks the progress of downloads and installations, and other matters requiring your attention. You can pull down this notification bar for more details. Than there are the widgets.

Swiping to a other screen brings up the Twitter Widget
(alternatively a you also have Friend Stream which integrates updates
from several social networking sites), without having to launch the Twitter app.
The information in these widgets auto-update at user predetermined times.

Another swype brings up my selected news feed.

You can also set up a home screen to look like iOS. The first seven
 "icons" are actually quick access widgets to phone settings. Green mean on, and grey means off.

This is the second basic core difference. Android has them, iOS does not. Widgets are an element of a graphical user interface that displays an information changeable by the user, similar to a window. They are valuable because they can provide a look at lots of different kinds of information and quick access configuration settings without having to launch the application.

With iOS, accessing information means scrolling to the appropriate home screen and launching the app. With Android, the information can be displayed directly on one of the several home screens.

Pinching any of the home screens will bring up all seven of my home screens

Ease of use. Google's Android interface is user friendly, compared to Symbian or Windows mobile. In terms of  intuitiveness, it is just not as polished as Apple's iOS, but comes very close. I have had to Google for information like how to change folder names. Still, you should become proficient with it after a days use. 

What makes Android more complicated is the the ability to customize the UI, and the adverse effects on battery life. Apple's iOS presents you with basically one interface, which Apple has tested to consume an acceptable amount of power to provide an acceptable battery life. iOS also only allows for a limited amount of multi-tasking which reduces battery consumption.

Android allows users to customize as they please and allows for full multitasking. Loading one or two dozen active widgets on the devices home screens results in having several active apps running, and will have adverse effects on battery life. Basically, while Android will let you customize to your hearts content, you have to do so intelligently. Making to many home screens too interesting, will suck your battery dry. 

Apps. Android already over 150,000 according to Google, and 200,000 apps according to other sources. With Android you are not limited to downloading apps from the apps store. The number of apps is not that big a deal if you ask me. With my two Android devices, a have download only about 12-15 apps to supplement the OS and the pre-installed software.

The biggest issue is that in many countries like the Philippines, you have no access to paid apps through the Android market. With the variety of Android phones available, compatibility can occasionally be an issue. Android market

In the end Android offers more customization options and more hardware choices, but does need the user to understand the operating system a little bit more.

Around the Web - MacBook Air killer, Froyo for the Motorola Milstone with a big but and tablet tests

Samsung Series 9. It is not too easy to build a Apple killer. The Zune is going the way of the Dodo, the iPad 2 still rules, and the MacBook Air is still the value for money ultra-thin ultraportable laptop. Techie.com.ph has the heads up on the new MacBook Air killer in waiting, the Samsung Series 9. With a second generation Intel Core i5 Processor 2537M (1.40 GHz, 3MB; turbo up to 2.3 GHz), 4GB DDR3 with a 13.3-inch screen in a 2.89 pound package which is actually 1mm thinner than the MacBook Air, it certainly looks the part. 

With a 128GB Solid State Drive it competes with the lower end 13.3-inch MacBook Air which also has a 128MB SSD.  Problem is the price. Techie.com.ph reports that the Samsung Series 9 Notebook will cost Php79,900. That is 12K higher than the Php67,990 retail price of the 128GB 13.3-inch MacBook Air.

While you may argue that the Sandy Bridge chipset and the Core i5 processor, and 4GB of RAM will perform better than the 1.86GHz and 2GB of RAM of the MacBook Air, in terms of graphics it is a different story.  The Nvidia GForce 320M graphics of the will runs faster than the Intel HD GT2 Integrated Graphics of the Samsung Series 9. So in terms of performance, some would call it a draw. 

The 12K lower price of the 128GB MacBook Air 13-inch makes it a win... for Apple. 

The Milestone gets Froyo. GSM Arena reports that Motorola has brought Froyo to the original Motorola Milestone. Our first reaction is, what took too long? The Milestone runs vanilla Android, so too much tweaking should not be necessary. But GSM Arena reports that:

What isn't exactly great is the message posted on the Motorola website, regarding the update. It states that "Exhaustive testing process has concluded that users may experience some adverse effects associated with the upgrade which could include slower operation of some phone functions and applications." 

Now we are not quite sure what to make of this. Is Motorola saying that according to their own tests the Froyo-running Milestone performs worse than the Eclair-packing version? If that is the case there's obviously something very wrong with the update itself as Froyo brings a notable increase in speed and responsiveness on all other devices that received it.

What gives?

Tablet wars. The Apple iPad 2 rules the tablet space for now, and the foreseeable future, but there is one area where Android rule. The Android's webkit browser is faster and more feature packed (supports flash) than Safari mobile. CNET tests which one is faster. The browser on the Android powered Motorola Xoom is still faster, but Apple has seriously closed the gap with it iPad 2.